My dear family in Christ, Recently, I re-shared on one of my social media accounts a quote from a colleague and fellow Sewanee alum, the Rev. Boyd Evans, that I thought particularly relevant to the state of the Christian faith in our American culture. To my surprise (and it’s always at least a little to my surprise to discover that every single person on Earth does not in fact see every single thing exactly the same way I do), my sharing of Fr. Evans’s quote led to a bit of controversy in the comments section. Some compelling and interesting points were raised by some good friends who took issue with the quotation, and that indicates to me that there’s some good “faith talk” to be had in exploring these ideas. Here’s the quote from Fr. Evans: “Christianity was never about individual salvation. It is well past time for us to get over this notion. If you don’t believe that your salvation is bound up with your neighbor’s, you have entirely missed Jesus[’s] message.” Now, we’ve talked in a number of different sermons, as well as in our Zoom Bible study and Faith Talk sessions, about the communal nature of the cultures in which both Testaments of Holy Scripture came to be produced. Both the ancient Hebrews and the ancient Greeks put family and community first, and the individual second (or third…). That is, of course, painting with a broad brushstroke; there were exceptions, and “community/family first” was not an etched-in-stone, inviolable law. But the fact remains that it was characteristic of both cultures that one discovered and understood one’s individual identity primarily in terms of one’s family and one’s community. “Who I am” was a question answered in the context of “who are my people” ~ or, better yet, “to which people do I belong?” To be sure, the ancient Hebrews understood things like justice in communal terms: if one individual in my community is the victim of injustice, then my whole community does not have justice, and I, as a member of that community, am likewise a victim of that injustice. The Greeks, as well, placed emphasis on community, as can be seen in the philosophies of, for example, Socrates as recorded by Plato. From such cultural perspectives, the notion that salvation could be something to which an individual could attain, regardless of the state or status of that person’s family or community (i.e., his or her “people”), would have been nonsensical. And yet, in so much of contemporary American Christianity, that does seem to be the way the concept of salvation is presented, is understood, is ~ to a real extent ~ practiced. We tend to commodify salvation, to turn it into a product or service that one person can possess or access without regard for or connection to anybody else. “I am saved; as for the person next to me, who can say? That’s up to God, and anyway, it’s none of my business” seems to be the popular understanding. But a number of my friends took issue not only with Fr. Boyd’s quote, but with the kinds of explanation that I just mentioned, above. One of them responded by asking, “So, individuals don’t matter, then? Can God not save an individual?” More than one person raised the concern about corporate culpability: “Does that mean, if my family or my community is evil and unrepentant, I’m going to go to hell, even if I’m a good and faithful individual, myself?” Personally, I didn’t see anything in the initial quotation to imply either of those meanings, but I have to admit that they are good, valid questions. So, what do we do, then? How do we respond? Well, to clarify, I am not claiming, nor will I ever claim, that there is anything that God “can’t” do. Full stop. I don’t think the question here is about what God can or cannot do. I think the question is, rather, about what it means to be human. What I am saying, and what I believe Fr. Boyd is saying, is that we as human beings do not and cannot even really exist as individuals totally separate from other human beings. Our interconnectedness is not an abstract ideal to aspire towards, but rather a material fact of our present existence. In light of that fact, it’s simply not feasible to consider just my individual salvation one way or the other as if I existed in isolation in some sort of individual vacuum. It just doesn’t make any sense to think about salvation in such terms. And it’s important to point that out emphatically because Western culture for centuries has elevated ~ really deified ~ the principle of individualism so much that it’s now gotten beyond the level of caricature. Western individualism has so distorted our subconscious conceptions and perceptions, of ourselves and of each other, that we’re often in active denial of the fact that we’re connected to each other at all. And that’s a perspective that is so utterly alien to that of either Testament of Holy Scripture that our perspective actively prevents us from understanding the Bible accurately. So again, it’s not about what God can or cannot do in terms of saving people. It’s that we in our culture are simply put unable to read the Bible correctly when left to our own cultural devices. And that is dangerous, to be honest. Likewise, it’s not “the group instead of the individual”; it’s that the individual is subsumed within the group, and the point of Jesus’s salvific atonement is the redemption and reconciliation of all humanity with (and within) God… … whereas postmodern American Christians have a lamentable tendency to view salvation as we view every other “consumable” good in our culture, whether it be good, fashion, housing, education, etc.: as a matter of individual benefit and/or privilege. I.e., “my salvation is my own, and as long as I’m saved, I might feel bad for someone else, but that between them and God, and in any event it ain’t none of my business, and it certainly ain’t my problem.” If that is indeed how we look at salvation, even (especially) subconsciously, then I think we’ll have a devil of a time (that phrase chosen very deliberately!) actually grasping what Jesus it teaching us, and what He’s calling us to move toward and live into. The other thing I think we need to consider is that “bound up with” and “depends upon” are not the same thing, just to clarify further. To say that our individual salvation is bound up with our fellow human beings is not at all to say or to imply that our individual salvation depends upon any other human being. The only One on whom our salvation depends is Jesus. But that same Jesus doesn’t allow us to imagine our own salvation in isolation apart from our fellow human beings. Perhaps that is one of the greatest Mysteries of the faith ~ namely, that Jesus Christ did absolutely and in actual fact go to the Cross and sacrifice His life for me, lone me, an individual sinner, in an intensely intimate and personal fashion … and that is exactly what He did for every other individual, and also exactly how He effected Atonement for all humanity and indeed all of Creation at the same time. Maybe we cannot really understand it fully as limited, individual human beings. Maybe all we can truly, authentically do in the face of such a magnitude of grace is to shout ALLELUIA, ALLELUIA, ALLELUIA! Happy Easter, y’all! Fr. C My dear family in Christ, Alleluia! He is risen! The Lord is risen, indeed! Alleluia! We are now well into the great Fifty Days of Easter, and despite some fits and starts (and stops, and restarts), it appears, at least as of today, that we might even be on the verge of Spring. Alleluia, indeed! In the previous column, we considered the shape the disciples were in when the risen Jesus Christ appeared to them after the devastation of the crucifixion. In particular, we looked at their need for recover and healing before they could take up their new vocation as apostles. I mentioned that there were two stories from Scripture that have been on my mind of late: the first was from John’s Gospel, the story of the man by the pool of Beth-zatha whom Jesus asked, “Do you want to be made well?”; the second, our subject for this column, is from the Second Book of Kings, the story of Naaman of Aram and his encounter with Elisha the Prophet. “Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man and in high favor with his master because by him the Lord had given victory to Aram. The man, though a mighty warrior, suffered from a skin disease. Now the Arameans on one of their raids had taken a young girl captive from the land of Israel, and she served Naaman’s wife. She said to her mistress, ‘If only my lord were with the prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his skin disease.’ So Naaman went in and told his lord just what the girl from the land of Israel had said. And the king of Aram said, ‘Go, then, and I will send along a letter to the king of Israel.’ “He went, taking with him ten talents of silver, six thousand shekels of gold, and ten sets of garments. He brought the letter to the king of Israel, which read, ‘When this letter reaches you, know that I have sent to you my servant Naaman, that you may cure him of his skin disease.’ When the king of Israel read the letter, he tore his clothes and said, ‘Am I God, to give death or life, that this man sends word to me to cure a man of his skin disease? Just look and see how he is trying to pick a quarrel with me.’ “But when Elisha the man of God heard that the king of Israel had torn his clothes, he sent a message to the king, ‘Why have you torn your clothes? Let him come to me, that he may learn that there is a prophet in Israel.’ So Naaman came with his horses and chariots and halted at the entrance of Elisha’s house. Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying, ‘Go, wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored, and you shall be clean.’ But Naaman became angry and went away, saying, ‘I thought that for me he would surely come out and stand and call on the name of the Lord his God and would wave his hand over the spot and cure the skin disease! Are not Abana and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Could I not wash in them and be clean?’ He turned and went away in a rage. But his servants approached and said to him, ‘Father, if the prophet had commanded you to do something difficult, would you not have done it? How much more, when all he said to you was, “Wash, and be clean”?’ So he went down and immersed himself seven times in the Jordan, according to the word of the man of God; his flesh was restored like the flesh of a young boy, and he was clean.” (2 Kings 5:1-14) This passage offers a contrast to the one from John’s Gospel. Unlike the man at the pool of Beth-zatha, Naaman is not physically hindered or prevented from accessing the healing he seeks. Indeed, he is not only given permission from his king to go to a foreign country to be healed, but he is also given a royal letter to give to the king of that foreign country, formally requesting that he be healed. In view of the length of his journey and the size of the retinue he brings with him, Naaman does not need to be asked whether he wishes to be made well. He is not in despair or on the brink of giving up. In fact, circumstances seem to be conspiring in his favor: the Prophet Elisha himself actually sends for Naaman to come see him so that he may be healed (and so he will “learn that there is a prophet in Israel”). No, Naaman has a different problem. His difficulty is not gaining access to healing; his difficulty is trust. When Elisha tells him ~ indirectly, through his servant ~ simply to go to the Jordan River and wash seven times, Naaman cannot accept it. But his reaction goes beyond mere disbelief … he gets angry. In his anger, he inadvertently reveals what is keeping him from trusting Elisha. He first rants that he had thought that, for him, the prophet himself would have come out to do the healing himself. After all, Naaman was an Important Person, the commander of the army of Aram, in Israel with the blessing of his king. And Elisha doesn’t even deign to come out of the house, but sends a messenger, a servant, to tell Naaman what to do? How insulting! Furthermore, he’s astonished that the prescription is just to dip into the Jordan a few times. There are rivers in Aram that are perfectly good ~ far better, in fact, than any in Israel! Why should he have had to come all this way when he could have just as well gone swimming at home (in those better rivers)? And how could something so simply and easy possibly cure such a serious illness as his? So it’s not just a lack of trust, and it’s not just disbelief. It’s also ego. It’s also pride. Elisha has not shown him the deference that Naaman believes he’s due. Nor has Elisha taken his illness as seriously as Naaman thinks the prophet should have; if he had, he would have prescribed a more intricate and demanding ritual to make him clean. But that’s not how healing works. To seek healing is to be called to a place of humility. It is to put our trust, to put ourselves, into the hands of another. It is to relinquish our illusions of being in control. And when the healing we seek is to come from God, it is to accept that we are no more (or less) important than anyone else. Interesting, then, that it is Naaman’s servants and underlings who manage to convince him to go back and trust the prophet, to humble himself and submit to the instructions Elisha gave him. Naaman does so and is healed. The man at the pool of Beth-zatha was neither prideful nor arrogant. The obstacles that had kept him from receiving healing were different than those of Naaman. But the two figures do share something in common: the healing they each experienced came to them in forms that neither man had imagined. At Beth-zatha, Jesus healed the man without his putting so much as a toe into the healing waters that he’d been trying to reach forever. Naaman expected Elisha to come out and make a show of calling on the name of God and placing his prophetic hand upon the wound to heal it. For the man who could not walk, simply standing up seemed a preposterous notion, as merely dunking himself a few times in the Jordan did to Naaman. Can we, today, find a way to accept that the healing God has in store for us will come to us in ways and shapes and forms and experiences that seem equally preposterous? Could we go beyond merely accepting that? Could we perhaps learn to expect it? My dear friends, I think we should expect it! We are here because we are followers of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. All of Scripture, and the whole history of the faith, demonstrates again and again that God’s people must expect two things: 1) God’s gonna show up in the most unexpected places, at the most unexpected times, and in the most unexpected ways; and 2) God’s gonna keep God’s promises, no matter how preposterous or crazy or impossible that may seem to us. We’ve been through a lot as a parish these past four years and change, and y’all had already been through a lot when I first got here. We need some healing. Let us seek healing with the diligence of Naaman, and let us respond to Jesus with the faith of the man at Beth-zatha. And let us continue to expect God to show up, right here, and do great things! Peace & blessings, C+ My dear family in Christ, Alleluia! He is risen! The Lord is risen, indeed! Alleluia! Now we live in the time of Resurrection. Alleluia! But what does that mean? What do we do with this incredible, life-changing, world-shattering Truth that we have all just witnessed a week and a half ago? It means that we are now called and appointed to go out and tell the whole world the Good News! And yet … that’s not the first thing that Jesus’s disciples went out and did, is it? No, before they would be ready to take up their calling as apostles ~ as ones who have been sent out ~ they first needed to process the incredible, unfathomable things they had been through. And, let’s be honest, they needed some healing. The road to Calvary, to the Cross and the Tomb, had taken a toll. Even the risen Jesus still bore the wounds of that journey, after all. Last Sunday, we heard how Jesus appeared to the disciples in a locked room where they were hiding, in fear for their lives, in the aftermath of their leader’s brutal execution. We heard how Jesus showed them his still-wounded body, because they needed to see, to know, that he really had died, and that he really had been raised. Jesus even made a second visit to the same locked room a week later because one of them, Thomas, had not been present to receive that healing, to experience that transforming encounter with the risen Lord. Jesus knew that his disciples were not yet ready to be sent out as apostles. He would therefore appear numerous times to various groups of people before finally ascending to the Father some forty days after his Resurrection. Even then, it would still be another ten days before the gift of the Holy Spirit would descend upon them on the Day of Pentecost, transforming them from a band of survivors into the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church whose ministry we share today. Clearly, a lot can happen in forty or fifty days. And, in that light, I have been reflecting on the process of healing and just how transformative the experience of receiving healing is for us. Two stories of healing have been on my mind and heart lately, passages that we have not heard recently in our Lectionary. I’ll share one of them with you now, and the other in my next column. The first is from John’s Gospel (chapter 5, verses 2-9): “Now in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate there is a pool, called in Hebrew Beth-zatha, which has five porticoes. In these lay many ill, blind, lame, and paralyzed people. One man was there who had been ill for thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there and knew that he had been there a long time, he said to him, ‘Do you want to be made well?’ The ill man answered him, ‘Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is stirred up, and while I am making my way someone else steps down ahead of me.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Stand up, take your mat and walk.’ At once the man was made well, and he took up his mat and began to walk.” It’s the conversation before the healing, the exchange between Jesus and this suffering man, that is so compelling in this passage. The man had been suffering for many years, and he has been doing everything he can, in his impaired state, to pursue relief and seek healing. Jesus clearly understands fully the nature of the situation, too. Yet the first words that Jesus speaks to this man who has been suffering for so long are: “Do you want to be made well?” The answer should be obvious. Is obvious, in fact. So much so that the man never even bothers to say “yes”; he simply points out to Jesus that he cannot get down into the healing waters on his own. Satisfied, Jesus heals him instantly, taking away the cause of his suffering and, at the same time, obviating his need to get down into the healing waters of the pool. So why does Jesus ask the question? Why that question? The fact that the man does not answer with “yes” might give us some insight. As just mentioned, the man instead describes essentially his own helplessness, his own inability to heal himself. Perhaps that is what Jesus is really asking: “Do you understand that you cannot on your own make yourself well?” If that’s the case, then this whole scene has something critically important to say to us, in our own day and age. Something important to say to you and me, here, now, at All Saints Episcopal Church in Appleton, Wisconsin, USA, in the spring of A.D. 2024. As we face our own challenges in our parish and our community, have we stopped to confront the question Jesus asks: do we want to be made well? We should not jump to answering that question too quickly. Remember that an answer of “yes” seemed even more self-evident for the lame man at Beth-zatha than it might for us, so let’s not take it as given. Let’s take time really to think about it, really to pray about it. Let’s actually put ourselves in the shoes ~ rather, on the mat ~ of the man in the Gospel passage … Are we doing in this moment everything that we can in our present circumstances to get ourselves into a place of healing? Do we have faith that healing is really possible? Are the obstacles to our healing external problems that are beyond our control, or are some of them the result of our own choices? Have we acknowledged, even to ourselves, that we need to be healed? We should note that there is an implied “now” in Jesus’s question: “Do you want to be made well now?” Are we ready to experience the healing that God offers us right now? Likewise, are well ready, in this moment, to put our full trust in Jesus Christ? The lame man in John’s Gospel has bent all his effort, for a very long time, towards getting down into those healing waters in the pool. When Jesus offers him the healing he has long sought, the man seems to think that Jesus is offering to help him get into the pool. Jesus’s healing takes a radically different form, one the man could scarcely even have imagined as a daydream: Jesus just tells him to get up and walk. And the man has the faith to do just that, despite his long-held expectations of what healing would look like for him. Do we have that kind of faith? Do we even think of faith in that way? If not, can we imagine what our faith community might look like if we did? Peace & blessings, C+ Follow-up to our Family Meeting In both our Annual Parish meeting last January and our more recent Family Meeting on the 17th of this month, we gathered together as a community and shared some wonderful food and fellowship. We also first began, and then continued, the process and looking closely and honestly at what’s working in our parish … and at some of the things that aren’t. We’ve named and appreciated the abundance of resources, gifts, and blessings that we enjoy as a worshipping community. We’ve also begun some important conversations about the significant challenges we yet face as we move forward into 2024 and beyond. And we’ve started to name out loud and share with each other the things we love, the things that frustrate us, the possibilities that excite us, and the treasured aspects of our church community that we fear to lose. The meeting itself felt a bit uneven, at times; that’s to be expected when there are different perspectives to be shared and discussed, all the more so when we’re talking about something ~ our very parish family! ~ that we all love so deeply and want so passionately to see grow and thrive. A little tension, in that light, is a wonderful indicator of the fact that we all care so intensely about this parish, this precious thing that we all get to be part of and which has been entrusted into our faithful care. Three huge takeaways from these meetings for me have been 1) the fact of deferred maintenance, 2) the need for deep healing, and 3) the energy and enthusiasm that spontaneously welled up at the March meeting during the small-group breakout conversations. I’ll have more to say about deferred maintenance and deep healing elsewhere. For now, I want to emphasize that, overall, there was a clear, vocal mandate from the assembly that we need to take action. In response to that mandate, I made a promise that, coming out of this latest meeting, I would, in consultation with the parish leadership, come back to y’all with a short-term action item, a middle-term action item, and a longer-term goal for the parish. The Vestry indeed has taken up that work as of our March meeting. In the short-term especially, however, we need to capitalize on the incredible energy that came up in the small-group discussions on the 17th. I am therefore going ahead and sharing my proposals for two areas of action and a goal for the parish … Short-term action: In the immediate short term, it’s clear that we need to create many more face-to-face opportunities for folks to engage in focused conversation together in small, informal groups. Obviously, the major challenge is finding times when people can actually get together. To that end, I propose that we use the two midweek time slots already on our calendar ~ Tuesday mornings at 9:30 and Wednesday evenings at 6:30 ~ for a variety of offerings, including but not limited to Holy Eucharist. While we need to make sure that we continue to offer midweek Eucharists at least one Tuesday and one Wednesday in each month, on the other days we could host in-person Bible studies, Christian formation sessions, Anglicanism 101 classes (both for newcomers and for folks who want a refresher or just to know more about our particular flavor of Christianity), discernment workshops (not just for discerning calls to holy orders, but for discerning any aspect of God’s will for your life). For folks who are not free on Wednesday evenings, I propose to offer Monday evenings, as well, for any or all of the above. But we don’t even have to limit these small gatherings to the things I just named. Circle Songs, for example, will be moving from Sunday afternoons to a weeknight. We could other evening gatherings for shared artistic expression, acoustic instrument improv sessions, and/or respectful conversations about the things going on in our world that … challenge our faith. We could have small group prayer gatherings, meditation workshops, lectio divina, etc. One thing I really want us to get going is a support group for folks who are struggling with having faith at all, especially in these challenging times. Something like “Agnostics Anonymous,” a place where it would be utterly safe to talk out loud about what you believe … or don’t believe. It would have to be a covenanted, confidential group, and I as priest would not be allowed to visit, except by express invitation of the group in advance, so folks would be completely safe to be honest and open. Middle-term action: In the slightly-longer short-term ~ i.e., the middle-term ~ we’ve got several plans already underway: to have a presence at the Farmer’s Market this season; to participate in Appleton’s PRIDE event again with our own booth/table/tent, as we did last year; to host musical concerts to which we can invite the larger Appleton community; and, on a somewhat related note, to host the first of what will hopefully become a series of coffee house style “open-mic nights” wherein our folks can showcase their many and varied artistic talents and original creations ~ the hope is that such a thing might grow into a real community event beyond just our own parish. Please stay tuned for more information as these ideas come closer to fruition. And please let the office, the Vestry, and/or me know of what other ideas you have for community engagement! Goal: “All Hallways Bright and Beautiful” For a concrete, tangible goal, we should commit to brightening and beautifying our hallways and corridors by Advent 1, 2024. Our sanctuary and chapel worship spaces are already gorgeous; our hallways, especially the long corridor leading from the Washington St. entrance, not so much. Between the bare cinder block walls, the dark green tiled floors, and the dim fluorescent lighting overhead, these hallway spaces, while comfortable to folks who are long familiar with them, are not as inviting and welcoming to new folks visiting our spaces for the first time. I’m currently working with our sexton, Andrew, to see how we can make the overhead light fixtures brighter. But given the artistic abilities and talents for craftwork of the people of this parish, I am convinced that it we put our heads together, roll up our sleeves, get creative, and get to work, we can transform our hallways into warm and welcoming spaces that make people want to come inside and stay with us. Artwork, quilts or tapestries, murals, designs ~ we could do all sorts of things with the cinder block walls. Donations of rugs and carpets could give the hallways a much more welcoming feel, though of course we would have to be careful to make sure such things don’t become obstacles or safety hazards. Lamps and table displays here and there, in addition to brighter lights overhead, could transform how our spaces feel dramatically. But that’s just off the top of my own limited head, so to speak. I’m excited to hear the creative solutions that you all come up with! And as always, I encourage ~ no, I implore ~ you to reply with your own thoughts, ideas, concerns, and solutions! Whenever you have something to share, a question to ask, or an idea for the parish, please say something to me; to Pete Gilbert and/or Stephanie Gadzik, our Junior and Senior Wardens, respectively; Emily Gilbert, our parish secretary; and/or any member of our Vestry. We all not only want but also need to hear from you! After all, we’re all in this together. Peace & blessings to you all! Christopher+ 920.266.9262 fatherchristopherallsaints@gmail.com PARISH FAMILY MEETING 17 March 2024 Prayer for Spiritual Growth Gracious Father, We ask spiritual growth for ourselves, our families and friends, and especially for our family of All Saints. Grant us growth in understanding and willingness to be your Body in this world. Empower us to live the mission of Christ: to preach, teach, heal, and make disciples. In joyful thanksgiving for the blessing of your presence in our lives, compel us to share you with everyone we meet. May our numbers increase, our commitment deepen, our lives be joyfully yours. Make us a God-centered people. In Christ’s name we pray. Amen. My dear family in Christ, As many of you already know, this coming Sunday, we will have a single worship service at 9:30, followed by a shared potluck meal, followed by a conversation ~ hopefully several conversations, actually ~ picking up where we left off in our annual parish meeting at the end of January. Lots of folks have, understandably, been asking what the plan is, not only for Sunday’s meeting, but also for the life of our parish moving forward. The first question is a bit easier to answer than the second. So here’s a rough overview of the plan for Sunday: After we’ve moseyed down from the Sanctuary to Kemper Hall and had a chance to get a bite to eat, I’ll call the (slightly) more formal portion of the gathering to order. We will share a prayer (the Prayer for Spiritual Growth, above), and I’ll offer a brief presentation to clarify and expand upon some of my remarks from the January meeting, including additional insights many of y’all have shared with me since that meeting. We’ll also go over some “ground rules” to make sure that everyone who wishes to speak gets multiple opportunities to do so, that no one falls through the cracks or gets “talked over,” and that the whole environment feels safe, respectful, open, and welcoming for everybody. From there, we will break out into small groups (4-6 people per, depending upon how many folks attend the meeting) to explore a few focused questions in more depth and detail. After each small group session, we will come back together to share (voluntarily, of course) any insights, ideas, concerns, questions, etc., that came up in the breakout groups. After two breakout sessions and group sharings, we’ll conclude with a full-group conversation to recap what we’ve discerned, and to identify 2-3 short term goals for action ~ in other words, we’re going to go ahead and decide specifically what to do next, coming out of this gathering. For homework: Here’s an assignment for you, to help you prepare for Sunday ~ go ahead and be thinking about the questions we’ll be exploring in our two breakout sessions (listed below). The more thoughts you can put together in response to these prompts beforehand, the more productive our time together will be. Breakout Session I Questions:
Breakout Session II Questions:
I’m very much looking forward to our time together this Sunday! See y’all soon! Peace & blessings, Christopher+ My dear family in Christ, As I sit down to pen my first newsletter column of 2024, the blur of Advent-Christmas-New Year’s-Epiphany is already behind us. Just barely behind us, is how it feels to me, and yet we’re already on the threshold of our Annual Parish Meeting. The nature of our Church calendar is that by the time the dust starts to settle from all of the end-of-year liturgies and services and celebrations and gatherings … we’re already a pretty good ways into the new secular year, almost before we know what hit us! We’ve got a lot going for us as a parish as we move into 2024. Thanks to the incredibly hard work of your outgoing Vestry and to the devotion and faithful discernment of all of you, we enter this new year with a much clearer understanding of who we are as a welcoming, inclusive, and affirming community of faithful, Episcopal (Anglican) Jesus-followers, as articulated in our formal Statement of Direction. As an organization, we adopted a set of parish By-Laws, for the first time in not-so-recent memory, to structure how we do what we do, in keeping with the canons of the diocese and the national Church. Thanks to your extremely generous support, we have managed, even in times of increasing austerity, to decrease the deficit in our operating budget, bringing us much closer than we’ve been previously to a truly balanced budget. Through it all, we have continued to welcome new folks into our parish family. We have continued to celebrate the holy Sacraments that are the heart of our Christian faith tradition. We have continued to honor and worship our God and to seek and serve Christ in all persons, guided by the Holy Spirit. All of that is true. It is also true, though, that we face a number of seemingly daunting challenges in 2024. It is a fact that we are a smaller parish after Covid than we were before the shutdowns necessitated by the pandemic. We have fewer people and tighter resources with which to be the Body of Christ in Appleton, Wisconsin. The work that we did last year to discern who we are as a community of Jesus-followers was monumental, but it was truly only the first step of the discernment work we yet must do. Now that we have a clear vision of who we are, we face questions of vocation—we must, in prayer and faith, both individually and in community, seek to understand the specific work God is calling us to do, in this place and at this time. We’ve confronted the question of who we are; the next questions are about our mission: what are we to do? Some of these questions will be hard to ask, and even harder to answer. Such discernment will require us to face our own fears, hopes, and expectations—both conscious and subconscious—about our beloved All Saints Parish. As I alluded to in a recent sermon, our parish is not now what it has been in the past. Moreover, things cannot remain as they are at present. Together, however, with our shared faith, commitment, and love, I believe we can embrace the new life that is even now being stirred up among us by the Holy Spirit. It’s scary—I’m not going to lie about that. But so is every great, exciting, life-changing opportunity. I believe that God loves All Saints at least as much as we all do. And I am very much looking forward to finding out what our God has in store for us in 2024. And I really, really want to hear from all of you as we begin this next leg of our spiritual journey together. Please “holler at me,” as we say down South, and let me know what you’re thinking, what you’re feeling, what you’re excited about, what you’re afraid of, what you hope to see as this new year unfolds. Email me. Call me or text me on my Pastoral line--it’s NOT just for emergencies, y’all!--and let’s keep the conversations going, both before and after our Annual Meeting on the 28th. I hope to hear from you all soon! Peace and blessings, my dear friends, Christopher+ My dear All Saints family, Here we are in the third week of Advent, careening towards 4th Advent this Sunday morning. And then, by some miracle of quantum mechanics and “timey-wimey stuff” (for any Dr. Who fans out there), we’ll rocket through the fourth week of Advent in a mere few hours, arriving at Christmas by 7:30 that evening. Whew! So, then, the important question is … what do you want for Christmas? : ) The older I get, the harder that question has become to answer. Early on, it was pretty easy: “Not socks!” After A.D. 1977, things got a little more specific: “Star Wars toys, please ~ any Star Wars toys!” These days, my priorities seem to have shifted a bit. I remember with no small degree of longing that time when my sister and I gave our father ~ at the time, the Academic V.P. of a community college in southern Georgia ~ a clear glass, empty jar with a rather artistic hand-made label which identified the contents as “PEACE & QUIET.” In point of fact, as my Christmases have begun to add up, I’m less and less interested in objects at all, however cool or clever such objects may be. In part, that’s probably because, having thrown myself into guitar as an obsession hobby at the age of 15, my “toys” have become way too expensive for Christmas presents… But whatever the reason, today I am much more interested in exchanging those gifts which are even harder to package than peace & quiet: things like time ~ moments with those around me that can be truly content, wordless, utterly un-hurried; things like connectedness ~ opportunities to be with the people whose presence, whose existence, nourishes and rejuvenates me, without having to do anything; things like love ~ not to put too fine a point on it. St. Paul’s famous meditation on the nature of love is oft associated (rightly) with weddings, but it applies here (and everywhere) with just as much relevance: Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable; it keeps no record of wrongs; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing but rejoices in the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. (1 Cor. 13:4-8a) Y’all, I can’t think of anything more profoundly countercultural in these present days of stress, strife, anxiety, hurry, conflict, uncertainty, isolation, loneliness, despair, loss, and pain … than love, the kind of love that rises to the definition St. Paul offered to the believers in Corinth. May the gift of this love abound for you all this Christmas, as we prepare to receive yet again the greatest gift this world has ever seen, the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. What more could we possibly ask for? Merry Christmas, everyone! Christopher+ My dear family in Christ, In my sermon this past Sunday, the first of Advent, 2023, I mentioned in passing that the day marked not only the beginning of a new liturgical season, and not only the beginning of the new Church year, but also the beginning of my fifth year at All Saints as your rector. Though I hadn’t put much thought into this anniversary at the time, over the past few days it has occurred to me that the moment deserves a bit more reflection. It’s been, after all, an “interesting” four years ~ in just about every possible sense of the word. Advent 1 of 2019 was, as I recall, rather colder and snowier and just more winterier (that’s a word now) than last Sunday was. An abrupt, if educational, introduction to life in the Upper Midwest. The people (y’all, that is) were on the other hand extraordinarily warm. I remember feeling immediately welcomed into this community. So many of you made it a point to come by the office, invite me to lunch, to find some hospitable way to get together so we could start getting to know each other. And I was very much looking forward to working my way through the whole parish that way as I began to find my footing here (always tricky in wintertime, as I’ve since learned…) Of course, that’s about the time that Covid hit us. I know I’m leaving out a lot, but, honestly, my memories from December, 2019, to early March, 2020, are a bit blurry. Things moved so quickly … from my first Sunday, through the season of Advent and into the Christmas season, to Epiphany, and then to officiating at my first annual parish meeting at the end of January … that I hardly had time to start learning my way around town before February. We had a retreat for the new Vestry on the second Saturday of March, and later that afternoon, I got word from the diocese that all our churches were to be closed to in-person worship, starting the next day. So then we stayed home for almost two years. There is no need to recount, and I certainly do not want to relive, our experiences of being shut down and sheltering in place, of translating “church” into an online experience, of partially reopening, of taking three steps back for every one step forward. Enough to acknowledge that we probably have not even catalogued all the various scars we all acquired during the worst of the pandemic, much less having started to heal from them. Rather, as I reflect on this anniversary of my joining your community, I’d simply like to share a few observations ~ my first impressions, really, of All Saints, which the past four years have demonstrated to be true. First, the people of All Saints parish are a deeply faithful people. Even before I got here, I realized that this must be the case ~ Bishop Matt had explained some of the history of the parish to me as I was discerning a call to come here, which, as many of you remember first-hand, was “a lot much.” A less faithful, less devoted, less loving congregation would not likely have survived the things that this parish has endured, and that was before Covid was a thing. As I’ve gotten to know more of y’all individually these past few years, I have been privileged to see how deep your faith goes here. And it continues to inspire me each week, each day. That is not to suggest that All Saints is without problems or challenges. We were facing a need to revitalize and grow our parish family even before Covid hit. Today, we are smaller in number than we were when I first arrived. But I am not distressed by that fact: for one thing, a number of other parishes in the diocese ended up having to close as a result (either directly or indirectly) of Covid, and we’re still here; for another thing, even during the worst of the shut-down, we still managed to add new people to our community; and for a third thing, what we might at the moment be lacking in numbers, we more than make up for in faith in Christ and devotion to this parish family (see above). Lastly, when I first got here, it struck me that there was not a single challenge facing this parish that was not simply a local version of one or another of the crises facing the entire Episcopal Church across the country. In other words, it seemed to me that every obstacle, issue, or challenge before this parish was a smaller-scale instance of the obstacles, issues, and challenges before the entire denomination as a whole. Four years in, I believe that first impression has been confirmed over and over. And while it may be disheartening to realize that our whole denomination if facing some serious challenges at present, it is comforting to me to know that there’s nothing wrong with All Saints that is specific to All Saints. Our difficulties are systemic and large scale, and are not due to any peculiar weakness or failing on our part. Despite my own weaknesses and failings, you all have welcomed and supported me in ways and to a degree that is deeply humbling, and you have welcomed my family into your own with love and enthusiasm. I know I can speak for them when I offer my ~ our ~ most sincere gratitude. We came here, literally, because God called us to come here. But y’all have made answering that call both a joy and a blessing. It is a privilege to be able to share ministry and the love of God with y’all ~ thank you so much! Peace & blessings, Christopher+ “Followers of The Way” In the interest of beginning to set the stage for the impending season of Advent, let’s reflect upon some of the most foundational terms and concepts from our shared religious tradition as 21st century Western, Anglican/Episcopal, American Christians … and let’s start with the most basic, the most fundamental term of all: religion itself. So, what is religion? Many of you know that I am a cradle Episcopalian; I grew up in this Church, as I grew up in the United States and in the South, in the downward slope of the 20th century. All of those factors have shaped who I am and how I see the world around me, the things I presume to be true on a subconscious level. So I grew up thinking that “religion” meant “church” and “worship” and that it was something that happened “occasionally” … once or maybe--maybe—twice a week, at most. On a side-note: I also grew up as the original Star Wars trilogy was first dominating popular culture, and I remember being rather confused when the characters in those movies referred to the Jedi order as a “religion.” What? I thought. They don’t go to any church! They don’t have any rituals or hymns or anything! How can that be a religion? I think perhaps if I had grown up in and around the Mediterranean Sea in the centuries immediately before, during, or immediately after the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ, I might have inherited a very different notion of what religion is—and then maybe the Star Wars reference wouldn’t have confused me so much. You see, there is an ancient understanding of religion that is much bigger, much deeper, and much more interconnected than modern American pop culture might have us believe religion should be. This ancient concept of religion goes beyond defining religion as (merely) a philosophy or a set of teachings (although many of the philosophical schools in ancient Greece would strike us today as having more in common with religion than with academia), or even a set of rituals or ceremonies. The ancients in many cultures (including those of what we now call the Near East) defined religion as a complete way of living. And that included many things which we, as modern Americans, tend to separate into distinct categories: philosophy, history, culture, family & kinship, metaphysics, food preparation & diet, law, biology, astronomy, ethics, worship, politics, poetry & literature, subsistence & economics, etc. All of these aspects of human existence were integrated into one interconnected world view that shaped every action, every choice of how to order one’s life, from sunrise to sunset, so as to live in right relationship with each other and in right relationship with the heavenly realm. The followers of religious teachers were called “disciples” because to follow such a teacher meant to be “disciplined,” to live one’s life deliberately so as to emulate the teacher as closely as possible. Now, to be fair, I don’t think for a minute that everyone in the ancient world lived such a dedicated and disciplined life. In fact, most folks probably didn’t. But for someone to go to the trouble of converting to a particular religion probably did mean that such a person would be taking on a new way of living, and therefore would be making a much bigger life-change than we today would associate with simply joining a church. We know that in both Jewish and early Christian communities, there were folks who hung out on the edges of those groups—interested in the religion, but not fully committed to that total life change I’m talking about. But these were the folks who were not yet converted—they had not yet accepted, for example, the circumcision or baptism required for full membership in those groups. For the folks who had undergone those rituals and accepted full initiation into those groups, however, I think it was much harder at that point for them to be, well, casual about their religion. I’ve even read descriptions of ancient Christian baptisms in which the candidate is asked if he or she is ready “to die with Christ”; if the answer is yes, then the candidate is plunged into darkness as well as being plunged underwater—without knowing what’s coming next. After being immersed three times (in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit), the newly baptized person is then brought up into the light and partakes in his or her first Eucharist—another mystery that he or she was not allowed to have any knowledge of prior to baptism. It is intriguing to consider what modern American Christianity might look like if that were the way we all had to come into the faith, is it not? Well, we need not go to such extremes. Still, what I’m inviting all of us to contemplate this fall as we approach Advent is this: to what extent does our Christian faith really pervade and infuse our lives? Are we Christian primarily on Sunday mornings, and maybe for a little while on Tuesday mornings or Wednesday evenings, perhaps? Are our worship services and rituals exist as ends in and of themselves, or do they serve as a means to some greater end? These questions are not meant to be rhetorical; they need answering, and each Christian must answer them for himself or herself. But they are neither meant to be answered quickly or superficially. Rather, they represent opportunities to spend time in focused prayer and in conversation with God. The Christian religion is about ordering our lives, day to day, week to week, year to year, moment to moment, so that we are constantly seeking encounter with Christ: in the inmost depths of our being; in relationship with each other; in sacrament, prayer, and meaningful engagement in the world; in both tranquility and transformation. Christian faith is not merely a set of philosophies or teachings (although the teachings are crucial!); it is meant to be a way of life. The first Christians called the religion The Way for this reason. And they called themselves followers of The Way. Deep study of Scripture, regular participation in corporate worship and individual devotion, and the ongoing attempt to ever mindful of Christ within us, Christ in others, and Christ in the world around us … these are the building blocks of The Way, and it is the mission of the Church—of all baptized Christians—to demonstrate this way of living in the world, to invite everyone to share in it, to teach it, and to support each other in our efforts to come closer to Christ and to live out our faith in the world. It ain’t easy. It was never meant to be. That’s why we need each other on The Way. Christopher+ My dear family in Christ, The Great Wheel of the Christian year continues to turn, and we find ourselves come round to another fall season. While it can be tempting to think of Autumn as a time of endings, especially as once-green leaves flare to brilliant colors and then drop to the ground, leaving bare limbs exposed, it is also a time of anticipation and beginnings. A new school year has begun, bringing new patterns & routines, as well as new opportunities and challenges, to students of all ages and their families. Many folks are now back home after their summer travels, ready to start back to business, and life, as usual (whatever “usual” or “normal” might be, these days…). And here at All Saints, we’ve returned to full choir & music at our 10:30 Sunday services. We’ve also begun new Sunday School offerings for children aged 5 and up, in two different age groups, as well as more casual adult-forum style Sunday School opportunity for everyone between services (c. 9:40-10:20) to stop by the Palmer Room and play “stump the priest” with your best faith-related questions. Speaking of Sunday mornings, as we welcome both newcomers and familiar faces into our in-person worship services, let’s of course be mindful of what we say and how we say it; even the best of intentions can result in saying things that can have a different effect than what we intend. In our genuine delight to reconnect with someone we haven’t seen for a long time, we don’t want to end up emphasizing just how long it’s been and risk accidentally scolding or shaming the person for having not been in church for a while. None of us does such a thing on purpose, but even unintentionally it can still be hurtful. That said, it has been absolutely wonderful to see our in-person worship participation continue to grow ever since we were finally able to reopen fully after the worst of the Covid restrictions were lifted. Our 8:30 Rite I spoken service, especially, has not only rebounded but increased its average attendance beyond what it was before Covid. Thank you to all you regular Rite I folks for your dedication. The 10:30 Rite II service continues to grow, as well, and I look forward to that continuing now that full choir and Sunday School offerings are back on the “menu,” so to speak. We continue, of course, to encourage online participation in both our worship services and our Christian formation/adult Sunday School offerings, as well. Many of our faithful members depend upon our online services to take part in our shared parish life and to stay connected with the rest of the All Saints family. These ministries are vital to the life of the parish and will continue to be a big part of what we do going forward. At present, our 10:30 Sunday Eucharist is livestreamed each week—huge thanks to our new crew of tech ministers who’ve stepped in to keep our Sunday livestreams going, by the way!—and we continue to offer an online Bible study (Mondays @ 11:30) and Christian formation series, Faith Talk (Thursdays @ 12:30), via Zoom. I post the Zoom links for each session on the All Saints Facebook page each week, as well as emailing the links to a list of folks who’ve told me they’re interested in these Zoom offerings. (If you’d like to be added to that email list, please reach out to me via the office and let me know!) Whew. That’s just the stuff that’s currently going on or coming up in the immediate future. We’ve got some more exciting ideas kicking around behind the scenes, too—look for future updates with more info as we move further into the fall season. Before we know it, we’ll be through the liturgical season of the “long green” (the season after Pentecost) and ready to begin in earnest the eager anticipation of Advent, looking ahead to the birth of Our Lord at Christmas. It continues to be my great privilege to get to be part of this incredible parish family. It’s an exciting time to be at All Saints, and I truly believe the best is yet to come. God bless you all, and Happy Fall! Peace & blessings, Christopher+ Liturgical Note for the Day of Pentecost & the Season after Pentecost One of the seven principal feasts of the Church (BCP, p. 15), The Day of Pentecost takes its name from the Greek Πεντηκοστή (Pentēkostē), which translates as “fiftieth”—the fiftieth day after the Passover. For Christians, Pentecost marks the day the Holy Spirit came down and rested upon the Apostles like tongues of flame, as described in the second chapter of The Acts of the Apostles. We acknowledge this event as marking the birth of the Church as we know it, and we celebrate the occasion of its remembrance with red vestments and altar hangings. It is likewise traditional in many Episcopal parishes for the congregation to wear red, as well, when attending worship on the Day of Pentecost. As the final day of the season of Easter, Pentecost fulfills the promise made by the Risen Jesus prior to his Ascension—that, when he went to the Father, he would sent the Holy Spirit to us, to complete his work in the world and to teach us all things, to be our Helper and Advocate. In our liturgical year, then, the Day of Pentecost is a point of transition; even as on Easter Sunday we move from the season of Lenten fasting to the season of Easter feasting, on Pentecost we move from the time of the Resurrected Christ in our midst to the time of his reign in Heaven, and the time of the Holy Spirit resting upon us, abiding within us … and lighting us up! The segment of the liturgical year which follows the Day of Pentecost is known, perhaps unsurprisingly, as the Season after Pentecost; it is also called “ordinary time.” That is not at all to suggest that it is a season of bland, pointless, mundane normality. No, the term “ordinary time” refers to the regular (“ordered”) progression of Sundays from Pentecost to the first Sunday of Advent, when we begin a new liturgical year. It is time devoted neither to a specific feast nor to a particular season in Christ’s earthly life; green is its traditional liturgical color. Personally, I find it remarkable that, for Christians, “ordinary time” means the time of living our lives in the presence and loving embrace of God’s Holy Spirit. It should indeed be “ordinary” for us (in both senses of the word) to be continually inflamed and illumined by the dwelling of the Holy Spirit in our minds, our hearts, and our souls. Is not that the very meaning of one of the names of our Lord and Savior? Emmanuel, God is with us. (There is, by the way, also a shorter period of ordinary time between Epiphany and the Tuesday--Mardi gras—before Ash Wednesday, which marks the beginning of Lent, but the Season after Pentecost is the “long green.”) — Christopher+ My dear family in Christ, HAPPY EASTER!!! (Alleluia, alleluia!!!) Surely, we’re not tired of shouting that acclamation out, yet, right? We are now three Sundays into the great Fifty Days of Easter, and I hope that this blessed season is bringing you light and joy as we continue to celebrate our Salvation in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, our Lord. It certainly doesn’t hurt that we’ve had a few days of (what this Southern boy would call) actual Spring, in and amongst the lingering cold snaps and persistent precipitation. Despite the fluctuations in the weather, it is undeniable that light and life are returning once again to our world. In other news of miracles related to the chilly temperatures that continue to nip at our heels, you’ll be pleased, I suspect, to know that the boilers in our building are back online! Our resourceful parish secretary reached out to the folks who’ve been servicing our boiler system, and in the span of an afternoon, they had us back up and running. Hallelujah! (And thank you, Emily!) Meanwhile, the Vestry and I are continuing the work which led up to the two historic votes that came out of our March meeting—the adopting of a new, clearly-articulated Statement of Direction for our parish, and, in keeping with that stated direction, the approval of same-gender marriage. The next phase of this work is to make sure that everything about us as a parish clearly and visibly and consistently proclaims who we are and the community God has called us to strive to be. We’re taking a look at signage, our website, our internal and external communications … and also planning events that will bring us together, help connect us with the larger community outside our walls, and give us opportunities to celebrate the grace and the blessings God has given us in this amazing church family that we share. It’s been a long, dark winter in many ways. But new life is springing forth all around us, amongst us, and within our parish. It’s a very exciting time! May God continue to bless you all, and HAPPY EASTER! Alleluia, Christ is risen! The Lord is risen, indeed—ALLELUIA!!! Yours always in Christ, Christopher+ My dear family in Christ, We have now had five parish forums* where we’ve presented a proposed vision for All Saints as developed by the Vestry and me last year ~ three in person forums and two via Zoom. *The sixth and (likely) final forum will be held via Zoom on Monday, March 13, at 6:30 p.m. I’m writing to you today to address some questions that have come up over the past several weeks. My hope is that we can go into this next forum with a bit more clarity about what exactly we're doing and why, and that answering those questions will help us find a greater sense of purpose moving forward. So, what exactly is this whole … thing … that we’re doing? Well, in a nutshell: We’re trying to figure out, as a community (a family) of Jesus-followers, exactly who we are. More specifically, we’re discerning what God is calling All Saints Church to be, in this place at this time ~ to envision All Saints as God would have us be. The visioning process is all about discovering our identity as the Body of Christ in Appleton, WI, in 2023 and beyond. Last year, the Vestry and I discerned that God is calling our parish to be 1) Christian, 2) Episcopalian, and 3) Affirming. But why do this vision/identity stuff, when we’ve got bigger fish to fry? Don’t we need to get busy and actually take action, actually do something? Fair points, but here’s the thing: we need to tease apart our vision from our mission. Our vision is the identity God is calling us into; our mission is the work that God is assigning us to do. In some of our messaging thus far, I think those two different ideas have gotten blurred together, and that's creating some confusion and frustration. We need to keep them separate in our thinking, or else we won’t have real clarity about either one. And we have to clarify the identity (vision) first, because who we are called to be will determine the specific work that God is calling us to do. In other words, when we know whom God has called us to be, we will see clearly what God is calling us to do. So, what would it mean for our parish to be a Christian, Episcopal, and Affirming community? Being Christian, in this context, means embracing and teaching the core truths of the Christian faith as expressed in the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds. But more importantly, it means making Jesus the center of everything we do as a parish community. It means that All Saints is first and foremost a church whose primary purpose is to worship God, particularly as we know God in Jesus Christ. Being Episcopal means embracing our Anglican-ness in our worship, our Sacraments, our role as an inseparable part of our diocese, the national Church, and the Worldwide Anglican Communion. It means that, while each of us individually might believe different things, we as a community hold to the doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Christian faith as we receive it from The Episcopal Church (see the Catechism, BCP p. 845ff). Notice how Point # 2 follows naturally from Point #1? There is a definite sequence to the proposed 3-point vision. It would make no sense to put Point # 2 first, or to remove Point # 1, because there’s no such thing as a “non-Christian Episcopalian”! So the order of the points matters. Especially because Point # 3 is the one that is, historically, most likely to be controversial… To be Affirming means to be more than merely tolerant of other people; it means more than merely being welcoming; it means embracing, supporting, and valuing each and every human being on Earth as the special creation of God Almighty who bears the holy imprint of the Divine Image, and in whom we are called and sworn to seek and serve Christ Our Lord. Point # 3, thus, flows directly from Point # 2, because it is in our specifically Episcopal sacrament of Baptism that we swear before God and the Church to adhere to the Baptismal Covenant (BCP, p. 304-5): Celebrant: Will you seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself? People: I will, with God’s help. Celebrant: Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being? People: I will, with God’s help. If we take our Episcopal Baptismal Covenant seriously (as we should!), we cannot have within our church community any “second class citizens” whom we allow in but do not fully embrace and support and value as complete and utter equals. And that goes for any categories that have been used to degrade, oppress, abuse, and/or marginalize particular groups of human beings: race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, education, gender identity, sexual orientation, &c. Now, everything I've said so far has been focused on our shared identity. On whom we’re called to be. What does any of that have to do with the work that God is calling us to do? Let me offer an example of how the one leads to the other: If we adopt and embrace the identity of being a Christian, Episcopal, and Affirming parish, then we will finally be in a position to do something that I’m told that Bishop Matt instructed us to do some seven years ago: namely, to make a formal decision as a parish about whether we will bless and solemnize same-gender marriages at All Saints. My friends, we are way overdue for making that decision. But I hope you see what I’m trying to clarify here: that we cannot possibly make such a decision (one way or the other) if we don’t first have a clear vision of who we are as a parish community. We have to sort out the identity question before we can tackle the action items. But if we embrace this proposed vision, then we immediately see, for example, our mission to the LGBTQA+ community, to the downtown Appleton community, to the Lawrence community, etc. And more importantly, we will then have the ability to build relationships with the people in those various communities, because we’ll be able to show them clearly and openly who we are. Every bit as importantly, we will be able to invite people to join our parish community, because we’ll be able to give people a clear vision of exactly what it is they’d be joining. That’s how we grow All Saints and build a community that will do more than just hang on, but will instead actually thrive and be a real source of light and refuge and healing and grace in a world that’s all too often very broken and dark for so many of God’s children. I urge you, my friends: please take advantage of the opportunity to participate in these crucially important conversations. If you're not able to attend the next forum ~ or if you just happen to be not comfortable discussing these topics in a group setting ~ please contact me (either through the church office or via my direct email & pastoral phone line). I would love to talk with each and every one of you, whether in groups or individually, whether publicly or confidentially. Thus far, the forum conversations have been overwhelmingly positive and engaging. People have expressed genuine excitement about what this vision of All Saints will mean for our future. People have also brought up wise questions and compelling insights about the challenges we might face moving forward and the factors we will need to address as a parish if we are to move forward in a healthy and life-giving way. But we have not heard from all of the voices in this parish, and we need to do so. Every one of you is a vital member of the Body of Christ. So please plan to log in to the next forum, especially if you haven't attended one yet; or if you're not able to attend or you're not comfortable attending, please get in touch with me and let's at least connect one-to-one. Yours always in Christ, C+ My dear family in Christ, It is with both great joy, and a little sadness, that I share with you the news that Erin Wolf, our Youth Minister for these past ten years, will be leaving that position this year at the end of December. While this change is significant both for Erin and for us, it is ultimately cause for much celebration: Erin has been offered the opportunity to step into a new role at the diocesan level as the first Youth Networking Coordinator. As she will also continue to serve as diocesan Camp Director, the new position—one created jointly by the dioceses of Fond du Lac and Milwaukee—will be full time. Obviously, therefore, her accepting the new position means that she cannot continue on part-time with us at All Saints. You may read the diocesan announcement here. Erin has been deeply involved in the life, worship, and ministries of All Saints Church for more than a decade. It is impossible to quantify her impact upon our congregation, her guiding presence in the spiritual, emotional, and social growth of our children (and parents), and her contributions to this parish. Vestries, priests, and even bishops have come and gone during her tenure with All Saints, and her moving into this next, exciting chapter of her life in professional ministry marks, in many ways, the end of an era for us. It’s perfectly natural for us to be saddened by such a big change… But y’all, I’ve seen the job description for the position the two dioceses have created, and in my opinion it fits Erin’s particular gifts, abilities, and vocation to a “T”; it is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that anyone in her place would be wise to take. God is at work amongst us here in Wisconsin, and great things are afoot. Please therefore join me in congratulating Erin on this incredible opportunity, celebrating her generous service to our parish, and rejoicing in what the Lord is doing for, with, and within God’s one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. We are blessed to have some time, during this season of Advent, to celebrate Erin’s ministry here with us, to thank her for her service, and to share with her in the joyful anticipation of a brand new chapter that’s about to begin. Advent, after all, is all about reflection and preparation and gratitude for all that God has given us. So this is a perfect time to give thanks for what we’ve had and to look expectantly to the good things that are to come. Erin, the words don’t begin to cover it, but THANK YOU! Between now and the end of the year, we will find additional ways to express our gratitude and our congratulations ~ well done, good and faithful servant! Blessings, Christopher+ & All Saints Episcopal Church My dear friends in Christ, In my last newsletter message, I presented a vision for our parish, a vision of who we are as a worshipping community, of who and what we could be, of where the Vestry has discerned, and I myself believe, that God is calling us to go and what God is calling us to become. At the time, I asked for everyone to get in touch either with the church office or with me directly to share your thoughts, concerns, questions, hopes, and/or fears about the proposed direction for the development and growth of All Saints coming out of (what is hopefully) the worst of the pandemic. We are now at the point of action: it’s time to begin implementing the vision that the Vestry and I have been discerning. If you have any significant concerns about, or objections to, our moving forward with this vision, please call (920-266-9262), text, or email me as soon as you can. Our proposed vision, once again, is that All Saints ought to strive to be theologically orthodox, unapologetically Anglican/Episcopal, and unequivocally inclusive/affirming of all persons, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, economic status, or cultural background. Here is a breakdown of what we mean by each of those three points:
These three points will, if faithfully embraced, become the defining characteristics of who we are as a worshipping community of Jesus followers and aspiring disciples as we seek to be the Body of Christ in our particular corner of God’s Creation. I believe all three are Scripturally mandated, theologically imperative, and thoroughly rooted in our Baptismal Covenant. But again, if you have concerns, questions, and/or possible objections to any or all of these goals for our parish, please contact me as soon as you can ~ I absolutely want to hear from you. Of course, you’re welcome to call or write to voice your support, as well. Either way, I truly want and hope to hear from y’all about all this. Hit me up and let’s talk about it! Peace & blessings, Christopher+ UPDATE TO ALL SAINTS COVID POLICIES as of 5 October 2022 My dear friends in Christ, Since the beginning of “Corona-tide,” we here at All Saints have taken a cautious and conservative approach to Covid safety policies, and we shall continue to do so, going forward. The Covid pandemic, after all, is most certainly not over. At this point, however, rather than setting a single set of policies “in stone,” as it were, we will be using the risk levels assessed by medical experts and published by local, county, and state authorities to determine the particular precautions we will require:
We remain fully committed to providing as many options and alternatives as possible for folks to engage not only with our worship but also with our community of faith in ways that feel comfortable, welcoming, inclusive, and safe. And we hope that our online/digital ministries will continue to grow and expand, even as we (also hopefully) continue to open up more and more fully for in-person gatherings. If you have any questions or concerns about these adjustments to our policies, please contact me via phone (920-266-9262) or email, or through the church office ~ I will be more than happy to converse with you, and I most certainly want to hear your thoughts as we work together to chart a way forward for All Saints Episcopal Church. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ My dear friends in Christ, For the past several months, I’ve been asking you to support your Vestry and me with your continued prayers as we’ve set about the work of envisioning the future (both in the short term, and the long term) of our parish community, and of discerning what God is calling us to do … and more particularly, who God is calling us to be. I invited the Vestry into this process last spring with the questions:
It was a very useful way to start, it turns out, because we couldn’t really even begin visioning any future for All Saints until we first confronted all of the needs, desires, expectations, and even fears that each of us brings to the table when we start talking about “our” church. Of course, it isn’t our church at all; it is and ever has been God’s Church, and we are blessed and privileged to be invited and called to participate in the work that God is doing through God’s Church. Even so, every community, every organization, every group of people, whether secular or sacred, has its own unique collective identity, its own traits and characteristics, its own gifts and strengths, its own mission and purpose. Much of our discernment work this summer, then, has focused on exploring who we have been, as a worshipping community, who we are now, and who God is calling us to be, moving forward. In this so-called “post-Christian” age of our society, it is no longer viable simply to be “that church downtown.” (For one thing, here in Appleton, we’re “just one of those churches downtown”!) People no longer attend church merely because “that’s what ya do on a Sunday.” These days, if folks are going to make the effort to get out and be part of a church community, they want a community whose faith, whose perspective, whose way of being and doing “church” speaks specifically to who they are and what they need. People “shop” for a church home as carefully as they do for a physical home to buy. They want to know what is unique and special about us, what sets us apart and distinguishes us from other church communities in the area, and thus what it would mean for them, in their lives, to become part of our parish family. Gone are the days when simply being an Episcopal Church was enough to answer those questions. How, in what specific, concrete ways, does All Saints embody and express and celebrate and live out our understanding of the Christian faith in the Episcopal tradition as part of the worldwide Anglican Communion? Toward that end, the Vestry and I have discerned three factors, three particular expressions of identity, that we believe God is calling All Saints to embody, that we believe will best express our unique identity as a worship community, and that will speak clearly and concretely to the specific gifts that All Saints has to offer the people of Appleton and the Fox Valley. Here is what we believe All Saints ought to strive to be: * Theologically orthodox. We should be a church community that boldly proclaims Jesus Christ and the Salvation he brings through his life, death, and resurrection. We should be a people of faith who can say the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds without having to cross our fingers behind our backs. We need not be in uniform agreement about every little detail of the Christian faith—as Anglicans (see below), we should always welcome a range of doctrinal perspectives and interpretations; the basic, foundational tenets of the Christian faith and the Apostolic Tradition, however, we should not be ashamed to proclaim. * Unapologetically Anglican/Episcopal. We should be a worshipping community that celebrates the liturgies, traditions, and practices of the Episcopal Church and the worldwide Anglican Communion, being informed and formed by the Book of Common Prayer, with the Sacraments at the heart of our corporate worship. Sacramental worship and Common Prayer have always been the hallmarks of Anglican Christianity, and we should enthusiastically embrace that identity. That does not mean, of course, that we all must be “high church ritualists,” or that we have to have incense at every service (I mean Easter & Christmas would be nice, but … J). It simply means that we should lift up our liturgical styles of worship as very positive aspects of who we are, offering an alternative to other styles and formats of worship out there in the larger community. * Unequivocally welcoming, inclusive, and affirming. We should be a parish community that really means it when we say "The Episcopal Church welcomes you," whoever “you” are. That means being not only a truly safe, but also a truly inviting place for everyone, regardless of politics, race, economic and/or social status, etc. And it especially and particularly means being openly inclusive and affirming of LGBTQA+ folks (and making that official by following the diocesan procedure for doing so, and then including our identity as an affirming church in our parish communications, our website, our “branding”). Friends, my personal thinking on these three points of identity is multi-layered. Primarily, I believe that the above breakdown is pretty much required of us by Scripture, Tradition, and Reason as we have received the Faith from the Bible, from our Lord Jesus Christ, and from the Episcopal Church to which we belong. But beyond that, it's a question of finding and renewing and sustaining a source of vitality for our parish, which in my view requires us to develop a clear, concrete, and unambiguous understanding of who we are. Of immediate importance, of course, is our need not only to revitalize but also actually to grow this parish, drawing in people from the community even as we find more ways to serve the needs of the community around us. Living into the identity outlined above will, I truly believe, position us incredibly well to be attractive to, and of the greatest service to, the people of this area. If someone is truly seeking to know Jesus, and is yearning not for a mass-media, info-tainment approach to church but rather for an ancient, deeply rooted faith, with Mystery, ritual, and sacraments going back thousands of years, and is also looking for an inclusive and affirming community ... where in the Fox Valley can they go? My sense is that folks can have one or the other: either traditional, sacramental worship OR inclusion and affirmation. All Saints is uniquely positioned to be able to offer both to all. I fully believe that God is calling us to do just that. But we have a lot of work to do to process such a vision and to discern our way forward in response to God’s call. To that end, we’re going to spend time together studying Scripture, exploring our Episcopal/Anglican theology, sharing all of our individual perspectives, beliefs, views, needs, concerns, fears, expectations, etc., reinforcing our deep connections with each other in Christ, and building new relationships as we move towards the future together. Look for information to go out in the weeks to come inviting you all to participate in a series of small-group gatherings, which is how we will begin this exciting process. It is my personal goal to make sure that everyone feels welcome, everyone feels safe, everyone feels heard and valued, and everyone is a vital and valued part of this covenant community, this portion of the Body of Christ in Appleton. Some of these small groups will meet in person; others will meet via Zoom, so that everyone really does have a chance to participate and to feel safe doing so. If you have any thoughts, concerns, hopes, and/or fears about this next part of our journey together in Christ, please reach out to me by phone or email (or after a service), and let’s connect and explore what’s on your mind and on your heart. My friends, I am truly looking forward to this next chapter in our lives together. I am deeply grateful for your prayers and your support, and for the privilege of getting to be part of your parish family. And I am in awe of the faithfulness, diligence, intelligence, and wisdom of your Vestry ~ they are, individually and collectively, an outstanding group of leaders. Please continue to keep them, and me, and All Saints Church in your ongoing prayers. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ WHAT DO WE BELIEVE? … continued My dear friends in Christ, As we continue our exploration of our Episcopal Catechism (which begins on page 845 in the Book of Common Prayer), we come to a point that might seem a bit unexpected. In the preceding section, our Catechism introduced us to God the Father, the First Person of the indivisible Holy Trinity, and gave us some insight into the nature of the God who made us. We also looked at what the nature of our Creator implies about the cosmos and about us as God’s creations. Having introduced the concept of God as trinity in unity and unity in trinity, and having spoken specifically about the First Person of the Trinity, we might expect to turn next to the Second Person of the Trinity, yes? Our Catechism, however, now turns in a different direction to address the idea of covenant. If we take a look back at the last question and answer from the previous section, we can understand the need for this change of direction: Q. How was this revelation [regarding the nature of God] handed down to us? A. This revelation was handed down to us through a community created by a covenant with God. We know what we know about God because God has revealed Godself to us, not just individually but collectively, as a community. And “community” here is defined in a very specific way; it does not refer merely to a random assembly of human beings, lumped together. No, this community is one that has been created by means of God’s entering into a covenant relationship with the community of God’s people. Implicit in this definition is that one of the purposes—perhaps even the primary purpose—for which our community exists in the first place is to receive, preserve, and pass on to future generations the revelation of God to God’s people. That is no small responsibility! And the authors of our Catechism rightly recognized that, before we go any further, we need to be clear about what a covenant community actually is. To do that, we must understand what is meant by the term “covenant,” of course. From there, we will examine the original covenant God made with God’s people and what God has revealed about God’s will for us as God’s covenant community. Take note of the way our Catechism defines “covenant.” All too often in our contemporary world, we mistakenly think of a covenant as being essentially a contract. But a contract is a formal agreement between two or more parties that are, for all intents and purposes, more or less equal in power, status, authority, etc. But a covenant is not like that. The parties involved in a covenant are not equal, and they do not enter into the agreement from anything resembling a “level playing field.” It can be uncomfortable in our tradition to focus on the notion of power (I suspect because many of us have seen the ways in which unscrupulous people have, for centuries, misused and abused religious authority to exercise worldly power over others in extremely destructive ways). But when it comes to our relationship with God, we cannot ever forget that “the kingdom, and the power, and the glory” all belong exclusively to God and God alone. Any view that contradicts or undercuts that principle is, essentially, idolatry. The Old Covenant Q. What is meant by a covenant with God? A. A covenant is a relationship initiated by God, to which a body of people responds in faith. Q. What is the Old Covenant? A. The Old Covenant is the one given by God to the Hebrew people. Q. What did God promise them? A. God promised that they would be his people to bring all the nations of the world to him. Q. What response did God require from the chosen people? A. God required the chosen people to be faithful; to love justice, to do mercy, and to walk humbly with their God. Q. Where is this Old Covenant to be found? A. The covenant with the Hebrew people is to be found in the books which we call the Old Testament. Q. Where in the Old Testament is God's will for us shown most clearly? A. God's will for us is shown most clearly in the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments Q. What are the Ten Commandments? A. The Ten Commandments are the laws given to Moses and the people of Israel. Q. What do we learn from these commandments? A. We learn two things: our duty to God, and our duty to our neighbors. Q. What is our duty to God? A. Our duty is to believe and trust in God; I To love and obey God and to bring others to know him; II To put nothing in the place of God; III To show God respect in thought, word, and deed; IV And to set aside regular times for worship, prayer, and the study of God's ways. Q. What is our duty to our neighbors? A. Our duty to our neighbors is to love them as ourselves, and to do to other people as we wish them to do to us; V To love, honor, and help our parents and family; to honor those in authority, and to meet their just demands; VI To show respect for the life God has given us; to work and pray for peace; to bear no malice, prejudice, or hatred in our hearts; and to be kind to all the creatures of God; VII To use our bodily desires as God intended; VIII To be honest and fair in our dealings; to seek justice, freedom, and the necessities of life for all people; and to use our talents and possessions as ones who must answer for them to God; IX To speak the truth, and not to mislead others by our silence; X To resist temptations to envy, greed, and jealousy; to rejoice in other people's gifts and graces; and to do our duty for the love of God, who has called us into fellowship with him. Q. What is the purpose of the Ten Commandments? A. The Ten Commandments were given to define our relationship with God and our neighbors. Q. Since we do not fully obey them, are they useful at all? A. Since we do not fully obey them, we see more clearly our sin and our need for redemption. It has been said that righteousness can be defined as being in right relationship with God, and that justice can be defined as being in right relationship with one another. The original Covenant that God established with God’s people was never intended to be restrictive, punitive, or burdensome in any way. We often fall into the trap of thinking otherwise, I suspect because we project our own, human ideas about law (and our often painful experiences with human examples of law enforcement) onto our conception and perception of God and God’s law. But we must remember that the law was given to us by God as a precious gift, a gift designed by God to enable and empower us to live together in community lives that are truly free, healthy, whole, holy, and filled with abundance. Indeed, measured against that standard, it is frighteningly easy to see where we, as individuals and especially as communities, sin and fall short of the glory of God. We shall take a closer look at our sinfulness and our need for redemption next time. As always, if this column sparks any questions, concerns, ideas, curiosities, or any other kind of response in your hearts and minds, please reach out to me via email or phone—let’s talk about it! And if you’d like to explore these things in a safe and engaging group setting, please consider joining our Faith Talk formation series on Thursdays on Zoom. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ WHAT DO WE BELIEVE? Continued… My dear friends in Christ, Continuing our journey through our Episcopal Catechism (which begins on page 845 of the Book of Common Prayer), we move from human nature to the nature of the divine ~ the nature of God. As Christians, we (the Church) believe that there is one God whose nature we understand to be triune (three-fold). We speak, thus, of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit … yet we are not polytheists but monotheists. In keeping with the ancient Councils of the Universal Church (the Church before the split between East and West) which gave us the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds, we affirm one, single God, existing as an eternal Trinity. In the words of the Athanasian Creed (the third creed in our BCP, found in the “Historical Documents” section): “. . . we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity, neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance (p. 864). A few thoughts on gendered language, before we proceed further: the Catechism refers to the Persons of the Holy Trinity using the traditional terminology that derives directly from the Bible and has been established by centuries of use in Christian worship and practice. This usage may well be problematic for some Christians in the modern era; along with centuries of tradition, women have also experienced centuries of exclusion, exploitation, and abuse at the hands of men empowered by patriarchal power structures in many cultures where Christianity took hold ~ and often the Church itself has been the patriarchal power structure that enabled and even encouraged such toxic behavior. These historical facts must be acknowledged. Not everyone, moreover, has had positive, nurturing, healthy experience with human fathers in this mortal life, and that fact absolutely affects the impact of the term “father” in a religious context, no matter how hard we try to separate theology from individual experiences. We ought also to acknowledge the numerous examples in both Testaments of the Bible of feminine language, imagery, and terminology used for, of, and about God. Jesus even paints a picture of himself as a “mother hen,” spreading her wings over Jerusalem to gather God’s people to “her breast” like a “brood.” It’s important, likewise, to note that the Church Fathers and Mothers were adamant, in antiquity, that the use of the term “Father” for the First Person of the Trinity must only be understood in its relational sense, and that in no wise could any concept of gender be applied or ascribed to God. Lastly, our Lord Jesus Christ repeatedly refers to God as his “Father” (abba, in Aramaic; ho pater, in Greek). So whilst we have rich, biblical material from which to expand our vocabulary for talking about (and praying to) God, we can’t really ever get fully away from the so-called traditional terminology, either. That said, our Catechism introduces us to the First Person of the One, Undivided Godhead thus: God the Father Q. What do we learn about God as creator from the revelation to Israel? A. We learn that there is one God, the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen. Q. What does this mean? A. This means that the universe is good, that it is the work of a single loving God who creates, sustains, and directs it. Q. What does this mean about our place in the universe? A. It means that the world belongs to its creator; and that we are called to enjoy it and to care for it in accordance with God's purposes. Q. What does this mean about human life? A. It means that all people are worthy of respect and honor, because all are created in the image of God, and all can respond to the love of God. Q. How was this revelation handed down to us? A. This revelation was handed down to us through a community created by a covenant with God. Notice that there is a subtle but extremely significant point that is implied, rather than stated outright, in the first question and answer. The section is labeled with the heading “God the Father,” but the first question asks “What do we learn about God as creator …?” The substitution of “creator” for “father” might seem like mere poetic license; it might even seem like an error of sloppiness. But I contend that it is actually telling us something important about the First Person of the Holy Trinity: namely that “father,” in this usage, primarily means “creator.” That is not at all to say that the act of creating is solely or even primarily the provenance of the male gender (an absurd proposition!). It is, rather, to say again that the emphasis we are supposed to take from the term, and thus to associate with the First Person of the Trinity, is the nature of God as Creator, and the Will and Love and Intelligence by which and through which and because of which all of Creation comes into being and has reality and existence. We also learn from the first question and answer that we have this understanding of God because it was revealed by God directly to the people of Israel (into whose family we as Christians are adopted through the sacrament of Holy Baptism). Our understanding of God, then, comes not only from our own thinking and theorizing, our own attempts at theology and/or philosophy, but also (and primarily) from direct revelation as experienced by people just like us: God revealed Godself to God’s people. The revelation to Israel makes it clear that God created not only the entire Cosmos, but humanity in particular, out of sheer love. In that act of loving creation and even more loving sustaining, by which God made all things and keeps them (and us) in existence, we discover the basis for a proper understanding of who and what we are, and of our proper relationship to God, to God’s Creation, and to each other. Lastly, from this section of the Catechism, we learn that this ancient revelation has come down to us through the medium of community. It is in community that we first learn about God, and it is through community that we continue to experience God’s presence, grace, and power. That is not, of course, to deny that each of us individually has a personal relationship with our Creator ~ obviously, we do. But we do not experience God, relate to and with God, worship God, serve God, or seek after God alone, in the isolated vacuum of our own, individual, subjective experiences. We do all of those things as individuals living together in community. Our individual experiences inform and shape the community, and the community in turn informs and shapes our individual spiritual lives and journeys. In the Christian tradition (and in the Jewish tradition out of which Christianity arose), it has ever been so. God created community in order for us to receive, and then to guard, preserve, and transmit to future generations, God’s revelation of Godself. The very nature of God as revealed to us therefore calls us again and again into loving community with God and with each other. And the way that God does these things is through covenanting with us. What is a covenant? Excellent question ~ one that we’ll take up next time! As always, if this column sparks any questions, concerns, ideas, curiosities, or any other kind of response in your hearts and minds, please reach out to me via email or phone—let’s talk about it! And if you’d like to explore these things in a safe and engaging group setting, please consider joining our Faith Talk formation series on Thursdays on Zoom. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ The Episcopal Church, as part of the Anglican Communion and tradition, has historically emphasized our common worship as one of our most important defining characteristics. We do not, as a rule, require people to sign their names and give their formal assent to a long list of doctrinal statements in order to join our Church. Rather, we invite everyone to come pray and worship with us, for we pray our beliefs.
But that raises a crucial question: what exactly do we believe? It is fairly well known that, generally speaking, if you ask five Episcopalians to give their views on a particular theological topic, you’ll likely get seven or eight different answers. In many ways, that is a great strength of our tradition—we create room and space, within our fellowship, for a range of perspectives, interpretations, and beliefs. We have, over the years, focused so much on the idea that Anglicanism is a “big tent” that it sometimes surprises people, both inside and outside of The Episcopal Church, to discover that there are a few specific things that the Church claims and believes and teaches as being true. Although it’s not necessarily our defining characteristic, we do have doctrines; we even have a small handful of dogmas. The dogmas are pretty basic—Christianity 101, if you will. (There is one God known to us in Three Persons; Jesus Christ is God’s only Son, both fully human and fully divine; Jesus became incarnate in the flesh, lived and died as one of us, and was raised from the dead to save us and make atonement for our sins … basically the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds—that’s our dogma.) Our doctrines are only slightly more involved. In many ways, our doctrines are simply interpretations of and commentaries on the Creeds. The Creeds are the distilled statements of what we believe; the Catechism explains how we hold, understand, and practice those beliefs. For the next several months, we’ll be taking a look at the various parts of the Catechism in order to explore what it is we, as a Church, actually believe. With that goal in mind, let’s begin at the beginning. From An Outline of the Faith, commonly called the Catechism (BCP 845 ff) Human Nature Q. What are we by nature? A. We are part of God's creation, made in the image of God. Q. What does it mean to be created in the image of God? A. It means that we are free to make choices: to love, to create, to reason, and to live in harmony with creation and with God. Q. Why then do we live apart from God and out of harmony with creation? A. From the beginning, human beings have misused their freedom and made wrong choices. Q. Why do we not use our freedom as we should? A. Because we rebel against God, and we put ourselves in the place of God. Q, What help is there for us? A. Our help is in God. Q. How did God first help us? A. God first helped us by revealing himself and his will, through nature and history, through many seers and saints, and especially the prophets of Israel. This first section of our catechism might seem a bit out of order. Why are we talking about human beings before we talk about God? But upon reflection, I think it makes the most sense to start here. How can we talk about our faith if we don’t first figure out who we are? Or, as Jesus says to Nicodemus in John 3: if I’ve told you about earthly things and you don’t understand, how can I tell you about heavenly things? So we begin by asking that most primordial of questions: who are we? And the most immediate answer is that we are creatures (creations) of God, not only part of God’s entire Creation but also especially created “in God’s image.” As the outline goes on to explain, that doesn’t mean that we look like God (ceilings of certain Italian chapels notwithstanding!). Being made in God’s image has little to do with appearance, because we’re not talking about something so superficial. We’re talking about nature, or better yet, essence. Who and what are we, on the inside? It is inside, in our essential natures, that we bear the stamp and imprint of our Creator. As the outline says, it is the fact that our natures reflect and bear the image of God’s nature that we are able to love, to be creative, to use reason. Perhaps most importantly, because our natures are images of God’s nature, we do have the capacity to live in harmony with God and each other. Why don’t we, then? The Catechism says that we have misused our freedom and made wrong choices. But that is, I think, the result, rather than the cause. What this part of the outline is telling us is that, as part of the inherent nature God gave us in creating us, we bear the gift and the curse of free will. This trait distinguishes humanity from the rest of the created order that we can observe. We are not animals, merely acting on instinct; we are not plants, growing according to environmental conditions; we are not minerals or chemical compounds, reacting mindless according to the laws of physics and chemistry. We have the capacity to love … but we don’t have to. We can create … but what we choose to create is up to us. We can choose to live in harmony … or we can choose to live in strife, conflict, and disharmony. And for so much of human history, we’ve chosen the latter. The last part of this first section of the Catechism offers us hope in the face of that history. God, our Creator, is neither neutral nor ambivalent towards God’s wayward creations. God loves us—always has, and always will. So God has never left us orphaned, has never merely abandoned us to our bad choices. God yearns after us and sends us help, specifically in the forms named in the outline. And that tells us something about the nature of God. Which is a good segue, because that’s the part of the Catechism we’ll be exploring next time! As always, if this column sparks any questions, concerns, ideas, curiosities, or any other kind of response in your hearts and minds, please reach out to me via email or phone—let’s talk about it! And if you’d like to explore these things in a safe and engaging group setting, please consider joining our Faith Talk formation series on Thursdays on Zoom. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ My dear friends in Christ, Last Sunday, I announced that we’d be making an adjustment to weekly practice: namely, that instead of alternating between using Rite I for both services one week and using Rite II for both services the next week, for the next little bit we’ll be using Rite I consistently for the 8:30 service and Rite II consistently for the 10:30 service. At the time, I did not provide any additional information about this change, so I’d like to correct that omission now and let y’all know “what’s up.” The decision to make this change had come from our brand new Worship Support Ministry Team, which had just met the previous Thursday. I wanted to update folks on the activities of this new ministry team as quickly as possible, partly to keep everyone informed, but also because we’ve been working hard to put together all of the various ministry teams I pitched the parish back in January at our Annual Meeting. So I wanted y’all to know about the progress we’re making towards getting these new ministry teams up and running. Worship Support had a productive and engaging initial meeting, and I think the work of this team will be good for us in both the short and the long term. Unfortunately, the docket for Pentecost Sunday was already overfilled not only with announcements, but with music and liturgy and a sermon that probably went on a little too long as it was, and a very important pause to recognize the gifts and extraordinary contributions of Matt K. and Carol J. to our music ministry and to the overall quality of our worship, as we’ve worked to recover from the worst of the pandemic shutdown. I didn’t go into any detail about the liturgical change because I was trying desperately to get everything in that needed to be gotten in ~ it was already a long service, and I didn't perceive that there was time for an in-depth explanation for the change, beyond mentioning that what we had been doing (alternating between both rites) was "experimental" from the beginning, and that there was an established practice of different rites for each service on Sunday, going back to before I got here. So, that raises the questions: why make this change? What’s the reasoning behind it? And is Fr. Christopher trying to blame the new ministry team, in case the change is unpopular? :p Well, no, to that last. To be clear, the responsibility and ultimately the blame for any aspect of our liturgy and worship must fall on me and me alone. According to the canons of the diocese (and of TEC), the rector or priest-in-charge is the “chief liturgist of the parish” and is the arbiter and overseer of all worship services within the parish. But even more to the point, I was the one who suggested the ministry team consider making this change. So much for blame; what about the thought process behind the change? There are several reasons for now experimenting (and this next phase will be every bit as experimental as alternating rites has been) with different rites for different services. For one, I have received some complaints about using Rite I at 10:30 ... and about using Rite II at 8:30. It's quite symmetrical, actually: as soon as I made the previous change, I immediately got complaints. As soon as I made this change, I immediately got complaints. And that’s perfectly okay in both cases, by the way! It’s the nature of living in community together with each other. In both cases, I have to say, the complaints have come from folks who care deeply and passionately not only about their own experiences in worshipping at All Saints, but also and I think even more so about the overall life and health and vitality of this parish (and The Episcopal Church on the whole). For my part, I find it deeply inspiring to see so many people taking their faith lives, and the faith of their church, so very seriously. I hope y'all really hear me when I say that, because I mean it with the utmost sincerity. So, yes, I've had complaints in both directions, both founded on solid, valid arguments & rationales. But that's not the only, or even the primary, reason for experimenting now with discrete rites for each service. One other reason is a concern about accessibility for newcomers who walk in off the street, largely without prior experience with liturgical worship at all, much less the long and rich heritage of the Anglican tradition. Even in the comparatively short time we've been reopened for in-person worship, we've actually had a number of visitors of just such backgrounds (or lack thereof), for whom this whole way of doing things is very new and strange, even in Rite II. Add in the beautiful but less-immediately-accessible language of Rite I, and the learning curve becomes steeper. Most of these visitors (though notably not all) have visited the 10:30 service. There have also been logistical concerns to arise from our experiment with alternating rites. It's made for more work during the already busy week, in terms of preparing bulletins for each service, because of having to shuffle back & forth between different templates every single week. Concerns have also been raised about the length of the 10:30 service, when Rite I liturgy is combined with service music, anthems, and hymns. (I'll add on a personal note that doing two Rite I services back to back does take more stamina on the part of the Celebrant than I'd anticipated, but that was *not* a factor in this decision! Just something I've noticed.) All that said, please let me offer all of you what I hope will be some assurances... First, as I said on Sunday and as I've said frequently in this letter, this change is just as experimental/temporary as the previous change was. We, collectively, are learning what works, and what works best, for us as a worshipping community. And I am still very much learning & getting to know this community, having lost nearly 2.5 years of time that I'd otherwise have spent doing just that. So, in my mind at least, nothing is etched in stone at this point. Any change we make must be made and held lightly, seen as experimental, and understood to be subject to further change subsequently. In other words, this change (no change, really) is "for all time"; rather, it is "for the time being." Second, I still want to integrate the two services more fully ~ or rather, the two communities that organize themselves around the two service times. My sense is that, before Covid, All Saints had been, in this regard, like many other Episcopal parishes, with two pretty distinct worshipping communities (the Early Folks and the Later Folks), with not a whole lot of overlap or cross-pollination happening between the two Sunday services. Getting these two groups to integrate a bit more with each other was one of the reasons for alternating rites week to week, to begin with. I’d be very curious to hear from y’all as to whether, and to what degree if at all, that has happened over the past several months. Third, I'm open to the idea of using Rite I for both services during specific seasons; I understand that that has been a practice here in times past. While I am reticent to use it for Lent and Advent (I'm aware that that's been done here before, and it's not an uncommon practice in our denomination), I am open to experimenting with that, too. I say I'm reticent only because I don't believe that Rite I is inherently "more penitential" than Rite II ~ I think that's a misreading of both rites, actually. (Yes, Rite I has the Prayer of Humble Access, but just look at all that stuff about sin and the need for a Redeemer in Prayers A, B, and C.) But again, I remain open to experimentation. Let's see what works, "boots on the ground," yes? Fourth, I have some more or less ambitious notions about what we might eventually be able to do with our Sunday mornings, especially if we do find ways to invite more new folks into our parish community. I would love, down the road, for instance, to have two full-blown, full-choir, fully-sung services each Sunday ~ one Rite I and one Rite II ~ and not have the Rite I service be relegated to a small, spoken service always. I think the opportunities that doing so would open up for us would be truly astonishing. I have some notions about those opportunities and possibilities, but I’ll save them for later columns … I don’t want anyone to get too worried just yet! :) Fifth, as I hope I've made clear with the above, Rite I is NOT going away or being removed from the liturgical practice of All Saints! Not on my watch. Lastly, I want all of you to know that the full range of Episcopal worship is dearly important to me, and it always will be. We are the inheritors of a glorious tradition, and I want to ensure that All Saints offers everybody as many ways to connect and engage with, and to experience first hand, our sacred tradition as possible. Yours always in Christ, Christopher+ My dear friends in Christ, Maranatha. Come, Lord Jesus. Kyrie eléison. Lord, have mercy. Christe eléison. Christ, have mercy. Kyrie eléison. Lord, have mercy. Amen. This is not the column I intended to write for our newsletter today. Then, yesterday, Uvalde happened. What more can we say? There are no words to name the depths of violence, tragedy, and loss that, once again, darken our world. That, perhaps, have come to define our world. It is difficult not to yield to such a conclusion. Once again. That little phrase multiplies the horror of yesterday’s attack. For we now live in a society ~ and have for some long years now ~ in which, if I were to refer to “the mass shooting at that school,” you would have to ask me to clarify exactly which mass school shooting I was talking about. We have been accustomed for far too long to having to say “In the most recent school shooting…” After the unspeakable horror of the Sandy Hook massacre, things were supposed to change. Nothing has changed. So what more can we say? And yet … we cannot remain silent. No faithful follower of Jesus Christ can remain silent, inert, passive, in the face of such evil. But what, then, do we say? What, then, do we do? Last night, I saw a post on social media in which the commenter was demanding to know “CLERGY WHERE ARE YOU?” [all-caps in the original] and informing all priests and ministry leaders that “WE’RE ALL HURTING,” so “SPEAK TO US AND GIVE US COMFORT!” Of course, I cannot speak for all clergy and all ministers, but I can tell you where this priest is: I’m hurting, too. I’m terrified, also ~ for my own children, and for yours and everyone else’s. And I’m angry. I am angry beyond the capacity of the English language to communicate. Nineteen more children slain in Uvalde. Two more teachers killed. The worst school shooting since Sandy Hook. Sandy Hook was supposed to be the turning point. It was supposed to be the moment when things changed. When we decided to change things, so that these atrocities stop happening every other week. (We’ve had, what, upwards of 30 mass shootings thus far this year, alone?) So, yes, I’m angry. I’m angry that so many other things seem to be so much more important to so many other people in this society than making sure that the scariest thing our children have to face at school is a pop test. I’m angry that so many people seem to be so willing to throw hands up in the air and say, “Well, what’re ya gonna do? It is what it is. It’s not like it’s ever gonna change.” Well, why not? People used to say the same thing about slavery in this country, about Apartheid in South Africa, about the Berlin Wall and the Communist Bloc in Eastern Europe, etc., etc. But slavery ended, Apartheid was abolished and destroyed, the Berlin Wall came down. The question isn’t whether or not we can do anything to change this evil. The question isn’t whether we should ~ we are absolutely obligated and commanded so by Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as expressed in our Baptismal Covenant. The question, again, is not whether we can do anything. The question is: what are we going to do? My dear friends in Christ, Alleluia, Christ is risen! The Lord is risen, indeed! Alleluia! Happy Easter, y’all! The Great Fifty Days continues, and I hope that this Eastertide has brought you all many blessings and at least a little peace in the midst of these continually “interesting” times in which we live. I hope that you all were able to connect in some way or another with at least some of our Easter liturgies, and that you experienced our shared worship to be as comforting, as rejuvenating, as inspiring as I did. If so, then ALLELUIA, indeed! It’s “been a minute,” as we say down South, since I had a chance to connect with y’all via this Newsletter column. My apologies! The first part of the calendar year, from a church & ministry perspective, always seems to be pretty intense. We come off the high of the twelve days of Christmas, and we immediately encounter the Feast of the Epiphany. For us, just after Epiphany comes our annual parish meeting. From there, it’s never very long until Ash Wednesday and the Lenten season which brings its own particular kind of spiritual intensity to all the other intensities we already have been experiencing. Then, before you know it, it’s Holy Week, and then Easter, and it hain’t gwine be (oh, excuse me ~ that’s Southern for “it is not going to be”) long at all before we’re at Pentecost and are celebrating the birthday of God’s one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church! Whew! So in the midst of all that ~ not to mention the complex lives we’re all leading and the intricate web of relationships that tie us all together as a parish family ~ it’s good to pause for a moment and reconnect. And before too long, we will have more tangible ways to do just that. There’s already a team of folks planning and organizing a renewed coffee hour for Sunday mornings, to be held outdoors to take advantage of the long-awaited change in the weather and allow us to fellowship more safely, even as the Covid pandemic still refuses to set us completely free. Our Youth Minister, Erin Wolf, is already planning a number of parish events to bring us together over the summer. And I will continue to expand our mid-week worship offerings, continuing (and growing) our Wednesday evening healing Eucharist and also (very soon) adding a Tuesday morning Eucharist, as well. It’s an exciting time for All Saints. If you feel the Spirit moving you perhaps to get more directly involved in this renewing and reinvigorating of our parish life, please reach out to me, directly, or contact the church office ~ several existing Ministry Teams would love to have your ideas, energy, enthusiasm, and service … and there are a number of Ministry Teams that don’t exist yet but very much need to! There are more ways than ever to get involved now, so let’s do it, y’all! Here’s to a blessed and beautiful summer ahead. Peace & blessings to you all, C+ My Dear Friends in Christ, Alleluia! Christ is risen! The Lord is risen, indeed! Alleluia! Happy Eastertide to you all! Well, I suppose that technically that’s a tad premature. We’re at the moment in the midst of Holy Week. Even so, as the bearers of Christ and as the embodiment of two thousand years’ worth of witness to the resurrection of Jesus, we know that the victory is already won! That it has been won for all time by the One who lived and died and rose again for us. The past few days have offered us a welcome respite from what has been, thus far, a rather windy, chilly, rainy, and ~ just to make sure I don’t forget that it’s Wisconsin ~ snowy springtime. Bright sun, blue skies, temperate weather … even when the next snow hits, which it is sure to do at least once more before finally receding for spring & summer, I will remember feeling, in a day like this, the promise of new life to come. And it will. It is absolutely inevitable. That fact is as true for the changing of the earthly seasons as it is for the eternal promise of God Almighty that, having died with Christ in our baptism, we are raised to new life with him in his resurrection. This time last year, I was reflecting on where we were, as a parish, after “13 months of Coronatide.” Guess we need to update that to read “the first 13 months of Coronatide,” huh? I went on to write: “Indeed, in many ways, it still feels like Lent began in March of 2020 and still hasn’t quite ended. The pandemic is still with us, and it will take time, perhaps years, to recover fully. Even then, things will never be quite the same as they were before.” Unfortunately, that observation continues to hit very close to home, even another year further along. But so does the next thing I wrote last year: “And yet … “And yet there is light. There is hope.” We’ve come a long way from our first Easter Sunday together, when I packed up my ancient MacBook Pro laptop (vintage 2013 technology!), drove over to the empty church building, set up my computer on a stack of prayer books on the altar, and livestreamed a service of Spiritual Communion in celebration of the holiest day in the Christian year … mainly because I couldn’t stand the thought of trying to livestream anything for Easter from my dining room table at home. It just didn’t feel right. Truth be told, our celebrations this year may still not feel entirely right. Covid, after all, is still with us, requiring us to continue to modify our shared worship in order to mitigate as much risk as we can. But we are together, both online and in person. We are singing together again, as a congregation. And, as of Easter, I’m delighted to announce that we will once again have the option of sharing the common cup as part of our celebration of Holy Eucharist. Yes, the wine is coming back! Of course, it will be optional ~ no one who is uncomfortable with the small but not non-existent bit of extra risk will need to drink from the cup. Remember that for nearly two millennia, the Church has understood that the blood is inherent in the flesh, so that to receive only the bread in Communion is to receive Communion fully. But for those who wish to drink, the cup will be available, at last, this Easter. And so life returns, in ways small and great. Life in Christ is renewed, rekindled, reborn, as Creation itself is made anew through the Mystery of the Cross, by the life, death, and resurrection of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. What that means for All Saints Church, as indeed what it will mean for each one of us in our individual lives and spiritual journeys, will unfold before us over the coming weeks, months, and years. This time last year, it was difficult for me to imagine that we would be where we are now, this Easter. I don’t know what awaits us over the next horizon, but I feel renewed and re-energized … and I hope y’all are as eager as I am to see where our Risen Lord will lead us next! Have a happy and most blessed Easter this year, y’all! God has blessed us richly, for the Lord is risen, indeed. Alleluia! Christopher+ My dear friends in Christ, As y’all know, with the beginning of Lent this year, we have added a service of Holy Eucharist with healing on Wednesday evenings at 6:30, with an opportunity for anyone who wants to make an individual confession to do so in the hour beforehand. These services have, thus far, been small, quiet, contemplative, and ~ as far as I can tell ~ especially meaningful to the folks who’ve been able to come out and take part. Thanks to all of you who’ve helped us get this new worship time going … and for those who haven’t come by yet to check it out, here is your renewed invitation to do so, if you’re able. There has, however, been some confusion about the new service, and so I wanted to offer a few words of clarification in this week’s newsletter, in hopes of clearing things up a bit. So, the question I’ve heard the most over the past few weeks is: “Why did you replace the Wednesday morning service we used to have with an evening service that the folks who used to come on Wednesday mornings cannot attend?” Well, the short answer is: “We didn’t.” Please forgive me … I do not in any way intend that answer to sound flippant or dismissive. But it is important, I think, to be clear that the evening service that we’ve added this Lent was never, ever intended to be a “replacement” for the morning service that we used to hold in the chapel prior to the Covid pandemic and shutdown. Replacing that service was never, ever the purpose of adding the service we’ve recently added. The new Lenten service was added because I was going to be here at that time, anyway, in case anyone wanted me to hear a Confession (a wonderful Lenten practice, by the way!), because it wasn’t going to require any extra work from anybody else but me, and because between the ongoing Covid situation, the ongoing strife in our society and in our lives, and the now-ongoing violence and open warfare in our world, a little extra healing during Lent is especially appropriate. The added benefit of the service time’s coinciding with the in-person weekly meeting of our Youth Group was exactly that ~ an added benefit, ensuring that there are enough adults in the building whilst children are present to satisfy our Safe Church requirements. Plus, an invitation to Eucharist is an incredible gift to be able to offer to someone who has just been through the Rite of the Reconciliation of a Penitent. Again, there was never the least thought of “replacing” the pre-Covid morning service with an evening one “instead.” In hindsight, however, it is very easy to understand why a number of folks thought otherwise. After all, the new services began at the same time that the morning livestream of Spiritual Communion on Wednesdays went away. But that wasn’t because the one replaced the other. It was simply because, with the extra time commitment required on Wednesday evenings, I had to let the Wednesday morning livestream service go. A tough call to make, but when we’ve only got one priest, we sometimes have to make choices like that. (The best I had been able to tell, not that many people had been tuning in to those Wednesday livestreams ~ although since I stopped doing them, I have had to wonder if perhaps a lot more people were tuning in than were showing up either in the comments or the Facebook metrics that I could see.) So since I stopped the Spiritual Communion service in the morning at the same time as I started the evening Lenten service, it’s easy to see why it seemed as though the latter was designed to “replace” the former. It wasn’t ~ I just wasn’t able to do both in the same day. That was the initial thinking behind the recent schedule changes. I do sincerely apologize for not doing a better job of sharing all of that information with all of you more clearly and more thoroughly beforehand. I could have done much better about that ~ and I should have. It likely would have cut down on some of the confusion. Another objection I’ve heard lately to the Wednesday evening service is that it’s a problem to have the service in the evening because many of the folks who used to attend the previous Wednesday morning service either can’t or don’t go out in the evenings at all. This objection is also based on the idea that the new evening service was meant to be a replacement for the old morning service, which it wasn’t. But it also raises a separate point that I think we all ought to think about: There are some folks who are part of our parish family who cannot attend evening services. We cannot ever forget that fact. We have to make sure that we make worship available to everybody in the parish, one way or the other. Let’s not ever forget that fact. But let’s also consider the fact that there are folks who are part of our parish family who cannot attend mid-week services in the morning or at noon. So we’ve also got to make such worship available to these folks, as well. We must not forget that fact, either. Now, here’s the really tricky question: which group is more important to All Saints? Well, “tricky” isn’t really the right word. I should rather say: “here’s the trick question…” Because it is a trick question: Which group is more important to our parish? The answer is a resounding “yes!” The goal is, and always has been, to get to a point where we’ve got two mid-week Eucharist services going every week ~ one in the morning and, on a different day, one in the evening. (And eventually, we will need to arrange to have both of those services livestreamed, as well.) Unfortunately, again with just the one priest here, the process of reopening and moving towards a post-Covid “new normal” (including adding extra services like these) has to be a matter of increments, baby steps, rather than our being able to do everything all at once. For the reasons I mentioned above, it made sense to add the evening service when we did. That does not mean that the morning service isn’t important, or that the people who would attend a morning service don’t matter. Everybody here matters! As soon as I’m able to add a morning service, we’ll get one up and running. My hope is to get one going later in the spring or over the summer, so that both services are well established by the time our fall program year gears up to start in September. So stay tuned for more news and announcements about that in the hopefully-not-too-distant future! And thank you for everything y’all do to support our shared worship at All Saints. In the meantime, please do continue to contact me directly with any questions, concerns, fears, hopes, delights, or any other sorts of thoughts and feelings you have ~ let me know what’s on your minds and on your hearts. Peace & blessings, Christopher+ |
Click here for the latest parish newsletter:
Categories
All
|